tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19127699.post8342743074240782310..comments2008-08-30T07:02:08.957-07:00Akindele F. Akinyemihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11615301401612913192noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19127699.post-60491302603553109452008-08-30T07:02:00.000-07:002008-08-30T07:02:00.000-07:00This move most likely cost McCain the election (not that he really had it in the first place). <BR/>Serving two terms as Alaska's governor and as mayor of a 9,000 person town a president does not make. <BR/>The reality is there is no reason to have her on the ticket. She brings nothing and undermines McCain's argument of experience. At worst, she ties McCain further to Oil as well. <BR/>Obama is above and beyond her in every way - as is Biden.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19127699.post-70011006078762339952008-08-29T23:05:00.000-07:002008-08-29T23:05:00.000-07:00Less experience than Obama? The fact is that she has more experince in an executive branch of government than Obama and Biden combined. And while Obama was casting a few votes during the 140 total days or so that he has actually been in the senate, Palin was governing the country's largest land mass (and richest oil fields), making dozens and sometimes hundreds of EXECUTIVE decisions a day. Oh, and she was also a leader in the private sector, yet another enormous hole in the Obama rice-paper resume.<BR/><BR/>This move may well have won McCain the election.Khaki Elephanthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09042470098012648139noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19127699.post-28967356918189963042008-08-29T15:20:00.000-07:002008-08-29T15:20:00.000-07:00Yes, "wimps." Right. Why don't you check the endorsements a little lower on this page for the larger point being made. <BR/><BR/>And regardless, Palin is a hilarious pick for McCain. Less experience and less intelligence than Obama. McSame's sealed his fate. Thank God.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19127699.post-42171954310866245292008-08-29T11:43:00.000-07:002008-08-29T11:43:00.000-07:00I guess the fact that she is literally an Alaskan beauty queen has no bearing on her being a "cutie", you anonymous bigots/fools/wimps?Chris Arndthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01321490069571209332noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19127699.post-9162707453318978332008-08-29T09:46:00.000-07:002008-08-29T09:46:00.000-07:00"Cutie"? Guess that's the Fox News talkin'. Laurie Dhue for VeeP!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19127699.post-37237151250145578602008-08-28T12:43:00.000-07:002008-08-28T12:43:00.000-07:00Along with the 'cutie' comment, it's interesting that almost every single endorsement you've made has been a woman - and most of those women have arguably been 'cuties.' Just sayin'!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19127699.post-83806908454976510902008-08-27T20:27:00.000-07:002008-08-27T20:27:00.000-07:00Great post! I couldn't agree more. And in your defense, I don't find refering to an obviously attractive woman as a "cutie" to be sexist. How often have we heard about Obama and Romney's looks? It's not as though you suggested that Palin and Cindy McCain jello-wrestle to celebrate if she gets the nod (watch, somebody will now say that I am a sexist idiot, but who in their right mind would want to see Obama and Romney jello wrestle).<BR/><BR/>Great site. Love your takes on the D!Khaki Elephanthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09042470098012648139noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19127699.post-81960221300654886612008-08-27T16:03:00.000-07:002008-08-27T16:03:00.000-07:00"This cutie from Alaska."<BR/><BR/>I think Palin would be a great pick for McCain. The only downside would be having to listen to sexist idiots like you refer to her as a "cutie."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com